Archive for October, 2007

BECAUSE OF THIS WE SHOULD ALL GO TO POLAND.

Wednesday, October 31st, 2007

Like Alex mentioned, we both went to Poland this summer. We lived in Krakow, a city that absolutly IS this class–for so many reasons.

I did some wikipedia research and guess what. “Krakow” derived from Krakus, the legendary founder of the city who built his castle on Wawel (pronounched “Vavel”) Hill ON TOP OF A DRAGON LAIR. This dragon was named Smok Wawelski and he ate virgins for dinner. Here is a site that explains the written origins of the legend.

http://www.cyfronet.pl/waweln/en/index.php?op=11,1,5

[We heard the version where the sly cobbler is involved but the king doesn't let the cobbler marry his daughter, even though he promised that whoever killed the dragon could.]

But the best part is the origin of the king’s name. “Krakus” is sometimes attributed to “Krakula” [sounds like "Dracula" to me. . .just saying] a pre-slavic word meaning judge’s staff, or a preslavic word “Krak” meaning Oak, a sacred tree most often associated with the concept of genealogy.

GENEALOGY=FATHER. hehehehe

JUDGE’S STAFF=RULE OF THE FATHER [?]. hehehehe

DRAGON=something important. I don’t really know but we talk about them a lot.

 Also, this year is the anniversary of the offical charter of the city in 1257 done by the Magdeburg Law. I got to see that  charter all written out an official. This is when historians date the start of the city. We were celebrating the 750th anniversary.  Never mind that the city had actually been there since the 900s.

 Also, Krakow experienced a few Tartar invasions and subsequent sackings of the city. This made me think off all our talk about the ear. Legend also has it that when a trumpeter was sounding the alarm from the tower of the church because he saw the tartars coming, he was shot in the neck with an arrow and his warning ended in a high shreiking kind of note. Today, every hour on the hour a man plays a little ditty from the church tower that ends on a high note.

 also, the Jagiellonian Univeristy [the best in Poland and where a certain fellow named Copernicus went] has a library with over 4 million volumes which is refered to as the “principle academic asset” [by wikipedia at least]. The two books/manuscripts/whatever you want to call them that Wikipedia choses to mention are “Copernicus’ De Revolutions” and “Bathasar Behem codex.”

CODEX. hehehe.

 okay that is all I can think of right now.

James Joyce and the Cultural Unconscious

Monday, October 29th, 2007

I’m thrilled to see Alex’s post about James Joyce, as I believe he figured more of this stuff out than perhaps any other writer in history.

For my last book, Printing and Parenting in Early Modern England, I chose the following passage from Joyce’s novel, Finnegans Wake, for my epigraph:

A bone, a pebble, a ramskin; chip them,
chap them, cut them up allways; leave them to terracook in the
muttheringpot; and Gutenmorg with his cromagnom charter,
tintingfast and great primer must once for omniboss step ru-
brickredd out of the wordpress else is there no virtue more in al-
cohoran. For that (the rapt one warns) is what papyr is meed
of, made of, hides and hints and misses in prints. Till ye finally
(Though not yet endlike) meet with the acquaintance of Mister
Typus, Mistress Tope and all the little typtopies.
James Joyce, Finnegans Wake

German Writing System and James Joyce

Monday, October 29th, 2007

This post is about two completely separate topics, but I was thinking about both.

The first thing deals with what Dr. Brooks was saying the other day about the new writing system the Germans introduced prior to the Holocaust.  Erin and I both studied abroad in Poland this past summer with Dr. Krammer, a professor in the history department.  Last Thursday, I went to his class to hear a Holocaust survivor I know speak.  After the lecture, I went to Dr. Krammer’s office and thought to ask him about this writing system.  I can’t remember the name of it, but he did take a book out to show me what it looked like, and it was wild.  They pretty much took every letter of the usual alphabet and came up with a different symbol that barely resembled it.  The sentences at the bottom of the page were impossible to read.  I can definitely see how this new system of keeping records could cause a massive amount of confusion.

 The other quick thought deals with the James Joyce class I’m taking right now.  This stuff is all over his writing!  It’s especially prevalent in Ulysses.  I always have to read outside notes along with the text itself so that I can make sure I know what’s going on and this was a paragraph explaining part of the chapter Scylla and Charybdis-

Stephen’s meditations on paternity take on a particular urgency in Episode Nine. Stephen envisions ideal paternity as literary creation—he argues that Shakespeare is not merely father to his son Hamnet but to all humanity. Stephen’s further arguments about the tenuosity of the father-son relationship and the insignificance of fathers relates to his own experience of alienation from his father. Much of Stephen’s Hamlet theory seems to develop out of his own life, and we see Stephen thinking about parallel personal matters—his mother, his sexuality, and so on—while he argues about Shakespeare’s life and work.

Insignificant fathers, literary creation, and Hamlet all in one!  My professor actually mentioned not too long ago that in literature, men focus exclusively all the time on the idea of “is this really my son?”  In my reading tonight, Leopold Bloom was worried about writing a letter to his semi-mistress when he began to fret over being the “last of my race” because his only son Rudy had died, and he was now too old to do anything about it.  I’m sure this will all just intensify as we get further into it.

 -Alex

Sunday, October 28th, 2007

For extra credit for French class we watched a movie called “Monsieur Ibrahim” about a Jewish boy in Paris whose father deserts him and commits suicide by lying under a train.  The father had always wanted him to be like his older brother, who you later find out never existed; ‘he’ was a means of controlling the boy.   After the father leaves, the boy, Moses, sells his father’s expensive books in his office so that he can frequent the brothel across the street.  I thougth it was interesting that he sold books for sex.  He also changes his name to Mohammed when his mother finds him, a rejection of the maternal and a rejection of his religion.

The Sopranos and the cultural unconscious

Sunday, October 28th, 2007

Brandon sent me the following e-mail:

I was just reading an interview with David Chase (the creator of the
Sopranos) and he articulated something you’ve been talking about in class about directors tapping into the collective unconscious. Specifically it’s about the final scene of the Sopranos finale, which I’m sure you’ve heard about, and if he actively was referencing The Last Supper:

“The interesting thing is that, if you’re creative, there may be things at
work that you’re not even aware of: things you learned in school, patterns you’ve internalized. I had no intention of using The Last Supper, but who knows if, subconsciously, it just came out.”

I thought that was pretty cool, both that he accepts that it wasn’t an
intentional reference yet still a valid one, and that he recognizes that it
may well have been subconscious.

Here’s my response:

Hi Brandon, that’s amazing; thank you so much for telling me about it. I saw that last episode, and most of the earlier ones as I’m a fan. The
thing that struck me when I saw it was that here you have the most famous crime family on tv who live beyond the realm of the law, the paternal symbolic, and are named for the female voice — oral/aural — the imaginary, and what do they eat for the last supper? Onion rings.

Rings are everywhere in this class, The Ring, hamlet’s father’s signet
ring, and when we get to moses and the invention of the hebrew alphabet, we’ll see how they melt down rings to make the golden calf — an image — because Moses takes too long to bring them the symbolic, written law on stone tablets.

So, Onions make you cry and rings are of course the 0 half of the digital binary of 0/1, the female/male genital binary. So, if you must know, I think that scene plugs into the subconscious in another way not unrelated to christ’s last supper: it plugs into the cultural sadness associated with the loss of the maternal/analog/imaginary and the renewed ascendancy of the paternal/digital/symbolic. Not unlike the christian context, in which the cultural sadness being played out in the last supper has also a great deal to do with the loss of the imaginary to the renewed ascendancy of the symbolic. Certainly, by da Vinci’s time the church had become the most powerful patriarchal institution in the world and the protector of the symbolic, inasmuch as the church funded all of the scribal publication centered in the monasteries, and controlled what was written and read, and how it was to be read. It was christ’s death, foregrounded in the Last Supper, that is the founding moment of the codex-symbolic. Christ has no biological father, thus no last name — Kristos in Greek means annointed one, a ritual often associated with the crowning ceremony of a new King, thus Jesus’s status as king of the Jews, and his Davidic lineage. He is not the son of Joseph and Mary Christ. As such, he cannot have gone through the Oedipus complex, as Oedipus himself did, and thus can not enter the symbolic. This may be why the Greek Bible gives him a biological mother, but refuses to give him a biological father.

Surely the authors of the Greek Biblical text knew the Greek mythological system, and thus would have wanted to sidestep associations with that system (adopted largely by the Romans), though there is a substantial body of classicist scholarship that recognizes the links between Christ’s story and that of Dionysus, a very maternal imaginary deity who was the god of wine, agriculture, and fertility of nature. In the portrait of him provided by Euripides in The Bacchae, Dionysus is beloved by the women in the city, hated and persecuted by the city’s founding fathers, especially Pentheus, who at the end of the play is killed by Dionysus’ female followers and dismembered by his own mother, Agave. The early followers of Christ were mostly woman, and Christianity remained largely matriarchal till the rise of the Church patriarchy near the beginning of the fourth Century. Interestingly, the main reason for the Council of Nicaea in 325 — in many ways the founding moment of institutionalized Christianity — was because disagreements in the Church of Alexandria (Egypt) over what was the nature of Christ’s relationship to his Father had gotten out of hand. Central to these disagreements was a debate over whether Jesus was
actually physically related to God the Father.

More importantly, Dionysus could well be the missing link between Christ and Oedipus, though when we finally read Sophocles’ version of the Oedipus myth you’ll see that he rather astonishingly invents a system of salvation that will be appropriated by early Christianity for their King and savior. First, Dionysus is the son of the god Zeus and the mortal woman, Semele (daughter of Cadmus of Thebes). Thus, like Christ, his mother is human and his father is a God. Second, given this lineage, Oedipus and Dionysus are actually related to each other. Dionysus is the son of the daughter of Cadmus, Semele. Oedipus is the great great grandson of Cadmus.

Christ can not have a paternal rivalry with Joseph over Mary, because
Joseph hasn’t slept with her, and isn’t his father. No paternal rivalry,
no rupture of the imaginary and induction into the symbolic. Thus, we
should not be surprised that Christ only speaks, leaves no writings of his own behind, and that the central message of his reformation of Judaism is that the Jewish law has become obsolete, and should be replaced by one law: Love thy neighbor as thy self. But really, that’s not a law in thetradition of the symbolic systems such as the Ten Commandments or the Jewish law in the Hebrew Bible. Those, like the paternal law, are negational: Thou shalt not.Christ’ wants to replace those negations with one affirmation — loveothers. Rather maternal, no? Mom says, “Go play nice.” If you don’t, shesays, “Wait till your father gets home!” Mom affirms; Dad negates.

Thus my sense that both last suppers, Christ’s and Tony’s, constitue actsof mourning the loss of the maternal imaginary at a moment of
technological change in which a new symbolic/paternal Reign is being
ushered in. Codex/scribal publication on the one hand; the digitization
of reality on the other.

Fetishization of Chalkboard

Sunday, October 28th, 2007

Hello!

 This Youtube video obsesses over words, divides segments of its posts into chapters, and makes chalkdust seem kind of like sperm; funny too.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMvMzQ4Vu-8

 -Sara B.

are we passing the popcorn?

Friday, October 26th, 2007

…in a childrens book part of the story is about castration and female circumcision…??

http://snopes.com/politics/religion/compass.asp 

 Read the examples and the Origin; anxious to hear what you guys think,

-Nellie

How Unconscious History Works

Thursday, October 25th, 2007

I’m posting a NYT article on dreams below for two reasons:
1. Lacan says the Real is most clearly experienced in dreams, so it’s no suprise that so much of dreaming takes the form of nightmares. Notice that before children start school, the realm of the symbolic, they don’t have nightmares, presumably because they remain largely safe and warm in the realm of the maternal imaginary. And notice that as we move toward death, the Real, we don’t have nightmares any more.

2. The following paragraph from the article is very important for understanding what I’m trying to teach you about the cultural unconscious:

Cultural specifics can also tweak universal themes. Dr. Bulkeley and his colleagues have found that nightmares about falling through the air are common among women in Arab nations, perhaps for metaphorical reasons. “There’s such a premium in these countries on women remaining chaste, and the dangers of becoming a ‘fallen woman’ are so intense,” he said, “that the naturally high baseline of falling dreams is amped up even more.”

If women in a given culture across many national borders all have the same dream, it means first of all that their must be a cultural unconscious, and that unconscious must be language based, because all of these women are Arabic speaking, thus my interest in linguistic history rather than official history. Furthermore, this paragraph pretty much inadvertently shows us how magical thought — here labeled “perhaps for metaphorical reasons” — works. Obviously, to the conscious mind, the words “Fallen” and “Falling” are very different words, because if we look them up “officially” they have different meanings:

Fallen: A woman who is seen as sinful or disgraced because she has had sexual relations prior to marriage.

Falling: being dropped or lowered

But the unconscious mind doesn’t give a damn. In its bizarre world, a world dominated by the EAR, not the eye — the ear belongs to the unofficial, oral world of the Maternal Imaginary, the EYE belongs to the offical, legal world of the Paternal Symbolic (signatures, letters, records, documents) — these two words sound enough alike that their meanings merge and become indistinguishable. Thus a woman who is worried because she had sex before marriage, a FALLEN WOMAN, dreams she is a FALLING WOMAN.

This is why I keep referring back to those crazy word pairs I put up on the board — kin/ink, Prince/Prints, Printing/Parenting — and suggested a connection between the Egyptian God who invents writing, “Thoth,” and “Tooth,” which we keep seeing everywhere, including a few times in this NYT article, and for no real reason. Also given the relation between the Symbolic, the Paternal, and the Law of the Father, please notice the following word pair:

Write/Right. The latter as in “correct” or “legal rights.”

For me, all of this explains why Hamlet is the most famous character in English literature and culture — he is the most MAGICAL THINKER.

Hamlet’s first words of the play, spoken directly to the audience as an “aside,” are:

“A little more than kin, and less than kind”
Here the magical pair is “kin/Kind” — he is collapsing the word for “relative” with the word for either “compassionate,” which he will not be, or the word for “a group of individuals with shared characteristics,” and he will indeed keep his distance from that group.

Also please keep in mind that the closest synonym for the second meaning here of “kind” is “TYPE” — as in what “kind” of person are you? What “type” of person are you?

Thus we get kin/ink and kind/type.

No surprise this his first self-description a few lines later is: “my inky cloak” KIN/INK

The next words out of his mouth, in response to Claudius asking why
“the clouds still hang still hang on you,” i.e., gloomy and sad, is: “Not so, my lord; I am too much i’ the sun.”

Here the magical pair is “Sun/Son”: He is still gloomy and sad because he still misses his father, i.e. he is “too much in the SON.”

Now if you must know, frankly I think the whole play is structured around another Magical pair: A dew / adieu.

Here’s how Hamlet begins his first soliliquy:

O, that this too too solid flesh would melt
Thaw and resolve itself into a dew!

This is clearly a suicidal death wish, and given that Hamlet is overweight — a fact that is referred to directly in the sword fighting scene with Laertes — it as an anorexic fantasy of suicide.

Then when he is given a reason to live by his father’s ghost, that reason being to revenge his father’s murder by killing Claudius, that reason contans the word “adieu” five times.

Ghost: “Adieu, adieu, adieu! Hamlet, remember me.”

Hamlet: “Now to my word; It is ‘Adieu, adieu! remember me.’ I have sworn ‘t.”

Thus for Hamlet, his father’s commandment to kill Claudius is deeply associated with the word “Adieu,” but his desire to kill himself is associated with the words “A dew.” And in fact the entire play is about his vacillation between killing himself and killing Claudius. By the end of the play, the Magical pair “A dew/Adieu” are completely collapsed into each other, because he forces Claudius to drink poison, then he drinks it.

One last thing, given what I’ve said about Official history being in the EYE, and unconscious history in the EAR. Each Shakespeare play is dominated by a body part. Guess what body part dominates Hamlet:

1. I think I hear them. Stand, ho! Who’s there?
2. And let us once again assail your ears
3. And let us hear Bernardo speak of this
4. I would not hear your enemy say so
5. Nor shall you do mine ear that violence
6. Upon a fearful summons. I have heard
7. So have I heard and do in part believe it.
8. With an attent ear, till I may deliver
9. If with too credent ear you list his songs
10. Who, impotent and bed-rid, scarcely hears
11. Give every man thy ear, but few thy voice
12. Pity me not, but lend thy serious hearing
13. Speak; I am bound to hear.
14. So art thou to revenge, when thou shalt hear
15. To ears of flesh and blood. List, list, O, list!
16. Wouldst thou not stir in this. Now, Hamlet, hear
17. A serpent stung me; so the whole ear of Denmark
18. And in the porches of my ears did pour
19. Come on–you hear this fellow in the cellarage–
20. Never to speak of this that you have heard

20 references in just ACT I to the EAR, and of course Hamlet’s father is murdered by means of the EAR, and refers to himself as the “WHOLE EAR OF DENMARK.”

One final thing about ears, eyes, and dreams. If the unconscious/imaginary (aural/oral) resides in the realm of the ear, and the conscious/symbolic (I / eye) resides in the eye, here’s why I think most dreams occur duing REM, or Rapid Eye Movement: The symbolic is going crazy, desperately trying to monitor what’s going on in the imaginary; but it can’t see anything, and when it gets too panicked, it wakes us up. That’s why, as this article suggests but doesn’t explain, we seem to more dreams when we WRITE them down: the symbolic realm feels more involved in things, and so allows us to remember more. And notice the rather odd use of “footing” in the phrase, “the nightmares abated and the man could regain his footing.” In an article about dreams, it is worth recalling that Oedipus in Greek means “Swollen footed,” and that the first writing system, cuneiform, was thought to look like marks made by bird feet in sand, and that the father of writing in Egypt, Ra, is a bird, and that dragons have wings.

NYT 10/23
In the Dreamscape of Nightmares, Clues to Why We Dream at All

By NATALIE ANGIER
The patient was a 37-year-old man who had been physically abused as a boy by his schizophrenic mother, often while he lay in bed trying to fall asleep. Nevertheless, he had grown into a reasonably normal, gainfully employed adult, and he thought that the worst was behind him, until one night he awoke to find an intruder rummaging through his dresser drawers. After that, his nightmares began — terrifying, recurrent dreams in which the intruder was a middle-age woman and a knife dangled with Damoclesian contempt from the ceiling fan over his head.

“The old fear memories had not gone away,” said Dr. Ross Levin, a psychologist and sleep researcher at Yeshiva University in New York. They “were easily reactivated by the recent trauma,” and just as readily twisted into the basis of a repetitive nightmare. Dr. Levin urged the patient to reframe the dream and rehearse alternatives to swinging blades and frozen fear, until finally the nightmares abated and the man could regain his footing.

Few of us suffer from nightmares crippling and persistent enough to demand treatment. Yet we all know how bad a nightmare feels, how it surrounds you and surges up to drown you and makes your teeth fall out in chunks and gives you leukemia and look, your 6-year-old daughter is running back and forth through traffic, and oh no, this train is headed the wrong way and it’s past midnight, and there you are a cowardly third-grader back on Creston Avenue in the Bronx, no, please, not the Bronx! And you scream and you thrash and you want to wake up.

By all evidence, outrageously bad dreams are a universal human experience. Sometimes the dreams are scary enough to jolt the slumberer awake, in which case they meet the formal definition of nightmares — bad dreams that wake you up. At other times, they are even worse. The sleeper thinks the nightmare is over, only to step into Your Nested Nightmare, Chapter II. Whatever the particulars of the plot, researchers say, nightmares and dreadful dreams offer potentially telling clues into the larger mystery of why we dream in the first place, how our dreaming and waking lives may intersect and cross-infect each other, and, most baffling of all, how we manage to construct a virtual reality in our skull, a seemingly life-size, multidimensional, sensorily rich nocturnal roundhouse staffed with characters so persuasive you want to … strangle them, before they can strangle you.

A big reason bad dreams offer insight into the architecture of dreams generally is that, as a host of studies have shown, most of our dreams are bad. Whether research subjects keep dream journals at home or sleep in research labs and are periodically awoken out of rapid eye movement, or REM, sleep — the stage most often associated with dreaming — the results are the same: about three-quarters of the emotions described are negative.

Moreover, said Robert Stickgold, a sleep researcher at the Harvard Medical School, we are ridiculously industrious dreamers, spending 60 to 70 percent of somnolence dreaming or in a dreamlike state called sleep mentation, which works out to three hours nightly spent in a state of anxiety or frustration as we show up late for tests or walk barefoot over broken glass because our shoes have melted.

Even bona fide nightmares are more common than most of us realize. Ask people to recall spontaneously how many nightmares they had in the last year, and they might say one or two, said Mark Blagrove, a dream researcher at the University of Wales in Swansea. Ask them to keep a dream diary, and they will report nightmares once or twice a month.

Survey and diary studies have shown that nightmare frequency varies by age and sex. Preschoolers are relatively immune to the bogeyman fetish, but not so their elder siblings. Roughly 25 percent of children ages 5 to 12 report being awakened by bad dreams at least once a week.

Nightmare rates climb through adolescence, peak in young adulthood, and then, like so much else in life, begin to drop. The average 55-year-old has one-third the number of nightmares as the average 25-year-old. At nearly every age, girls and women report having significantly more nightmares than do boys and men, a fact that some researchers say may be related to women’s comparatively higher rates of anxiety and mood disorders.

Nightmare content also shifts over time and across cultures. A young man in 21st-century America might not mind the occasional bawdy dream, but for St. Augustine, the fourth-century Christian philosopher, “sexual dreams were nightmares,” said Kelly Bulkeley, a dream researcher and visiting scholar at the Graduate Theological Union in Berkeley, Calif. “He considered them threats to his faith.”

Cultural specifics can also tweak universal themes. Dr. Bulkeley and his colleagues have found that nightmares about falling through the air are common among women in Arab nations, perhaps for metaphorical reasons. “There’s such a premium in these countries on women remaining chaste, and the dangers of becoming a ‘fallen woman’ are so intense,” he said, “that the naturally high baseline of falling dreams is amped up even more.”

Using brain imaging devices that are noisy and uncomfortable and less than conducive to a good night’s sleep, scientists have nonetheless begun identifying which regions of the brain are active during sleep and which are largely off-line. The brain proceeds through four stages of sleep at night, each characterized by its own pattern of brainwaves and neurochemical activity. REM sleep, when the eyes are flitting behind closed lids, is rightly renowned as the dreaming stage, with at least 90 percent of it spent dreaming. But dreams occur in parts of non-REM sleep, as well.

When slipping into REM sleep, Dr. Levin said, “the whole brain changes.” “Neurochemically, it’s like the Fourth of July,” as cortical precincts shift colors in scanning images to indicate arousal or quiescence, he said, adding, “The limbic system becomes incredibly active, much more so than when you’re awake, which is why you’re emotionally on edge in dreams.”

Blazing with particularly patriotic fervor in the limbic system are the amygdala and anterior cingulate cortex, constituting what Steven H. Woodward, a psychologist at the V.A. hospital in Menlo Park, Calif., terms the brain’s “axis of fear.” At the same time, the prefrontal cortex, seat of rational thought and critical reasoning, is on lunch break, Dr. Levin said, “which is why you can have a dream where something has 4 heads and 12 legs, and you think, ‘No problem, what’s next?’”

Also relatively tranquilized is the primary visual cortex, recipient of visual signals from the outside world. The secondary visual cortex, however, which helps process and interpret those signals, remains alert. It is here that the fabulous imagery of dreams probably arises, said Tore Nielsen of the University of Montreal, as the secondary visual cortex strives to decipher the signals ricocheting through it, many of them internally generated, and to splice them into some approximation of a coherent whole.

Other sensory and motor systems remain active in REM, including those that would normally control the arms and legs, which is why motion figures prominently in many dreams. But if you often feel frustrated, as though you can never get to where you’re going, well, you can’t.

As it happens, one vigilant player in dreaming is a small region of the brainstem that paralyzes most of the body, preventing you from physically acting out your dream. People with neurogenerative diseases that disable this brainstem disabler can end up injuring themselves during extreme dream-driven actions. Most cases of sleepwalking occur in non-REM sleep, when the body is not paralyzed.

With so much of the sleeping body and brain apparently colluding to allow us to wander safely through an ominous dreamscape of extravagant characters, most sleep scientists are convinced that dreaming serves an essential, possibly evolutionarily adaptive, purpose.

In a recent paper in Psychological Bulletin, Dr. Nielsen and Dr. Levin proposed that dreaming served to create what they call “fear extinction memories,” the brain’s way of scrambling, detoxifying and finally discarding old fearful memories, the better to move on and make synaptic space for any novel threats that may show up at the door. “The brain learns quickly what to be afraid of,” Dr. Nielsen said. “But if there isn’t a check on the process, we’d fear things in adulthood we feared in childhood.”

Ordinary bad dreams rarely recapitulate unpleasant events from real life but instead cannibalize them for props and spare parts, and through that reinvention, Dr. Nielsen explained, the fears are defanged. “A bad dream that doesn’t lead to awakening is successful in dealing with intense emotion,” he said. “It’s disturbing, but there is some kind of resolution to the extent we don’t wake up.”

By this scenario, nightmares, in allowing you to escape prematurely, represent a failure of the “fear extinction” system. “Bad dreams are functional, nightmares dysfunctional,” he said.

If you feel yourself falling, spread your arms out and learn how to fly.

A mother’s seemingly successful search to “cure” her autistic son…

Thursday, October 25th, 2007

This is the most e-mailed article on psychologytoday.com right now….

The Strange Case of Homeopathy
In 1994, NASA computer scientist Amy Lansky of Portola Valley, California, began wondering about her two-year-old son. Max knew the alphabet and could beat adults at memory games, but he barely spoke and, despite normal hearing, didn’t seem to understand language. At preschool he was a loner. His main form of communication was poking people with his finger. Eventually, school officials urged Lansky to have him evaluated. The diagnosis: autism, a neurological and behavioral disorder for which there is no known remedy.

But Lansky refused to believe Max was untreatable. Her search for an answer led her to homeopathy, an 18th-century healing art now enjoying renewed popularity because of Americans’ growing interest in alternative medicine. Homeopathy involves treating illnesses with such extreme dilutions of herbs, animal substances and chemical compounds that frequently not one molecule of the diluted substance is left in the solution. Homeopathy defies the known laws of science, not to mention common sense. But rigorous studies show it just may work. The rest of this article can be found here: http://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/pto-20040302-000003.html

Jenna Purdy

Sentimentality: A Fetish for Firsts

Thursday, October 25th, 2007

Oh, and the same day I saw the Homeopathy article…this was right next to it.

Why do original artworks sell for big bucks at auction while reproductions languish at yard sales? How is that pair of earrings your grandmother gave you different from every identical pair? Who taught you that autographs are worth anything? It’s not brainwashing, according to recent research—we’re born to value items with unique histories.
Evidence comes from two studies reported in Cognition by psychologists Bruce Hood of the University of Bristol and Paul Bloom of Yale. They asked kids ages 3 to 6 to throw their favorite playthings into a “copying machine” and then decide which they wanted to keep: the original or the smoke-and-mirrors “clone.” Kids with the strongest attachments to their blanky preferred box No. 1 far more than the others did. And kids had no qualms about a copy of an anonymous piece of precious metal but preferred an object purportedly owned by Queen Elizabeth II over its duplicate; they believed that two things could be materially identical but might differ in some special way—this spoon was the Queen’s!

Susan Gelman of the University of Michigan has done similar work and agrees that we naturally imbue unseen “essences” to things. Essentialism may in part be an evolutionary response to fear of contagion. In a world full of germs, an object’s historical path can be more important than its surface appearance. “Essentialism seems to provoke magical reasoning—witchcraft, blessings, et cetera,” Gelman says. “And yes, it also explains why we prefer authentic things, including autographs, original works of art, and Britney Spears’ chewed gum.” Jenna Purdy